Nottingham
City Council recognises the importance of food sampling for analysis and is committed to providing a
food sampling service.
Food sampling provides a valuable
means of surveillance to ensure
that food safety and hygiene standards are monitored in accordance with current food safety legislation.
The Food Safety Act (1990) allows Authorised Officers from Local Authorities to obtain food samples
for analysis/examination which are taken in accordance with the relevant guidance from the Food Standards
Agency and the Health Protection Agency Collaborating Laboratories (formerly known as the Public Health
Laboratory Service, PHLS).
Why are food samples taken?
The
main aims and objectives of food sampling are to:
- Identify
food that could pose a hazard to the consumer through the presence of significant levels of harmful
bacteria.
- Support the food law surveillance functions of the authority
and assist in the identification of food safety legislation contraventions.
- Assist
in the evaluation of food hygiene practices in food businesses and to determine if advice or enforcement
action is appropriate in premises where it is suspected that poor practices and procedures exist.
- Assess
the microbiological quality of food manufactured, distributed or retailed in the area.
Food
complaints submitted to the Food Safety Team are not classified as food samples.
When
will a food sample be taken?
Food samples are usually taken
in the following situations:
- Investigation of food
poisoning outbreaks and food contamination incidents.
- European
Community co-ordinated programmes for the official control of foodstuffs.
- Food
Standards Agency co-ordinated sampling programmes.
- LACORS (Local
Authority Co-ordinating body on Regulatory Services) / HPA (Health Protection Agency) co-ordinated sampling
programmes.
- Nottinghamshire Food Sampling Group surveys.
- Home
or Originating Authority responsibilities.
- As part of routine food
hygiene inspections to aid assessment of food safety management.
Nottinghamshire
Food Sampling Group
Nottingham City Council is a member of
the Nottinghamshire Food Sampling Group which is responsible for implementing both regional and nationally
co-ordinated sampling programmes. The food group meet on a quarterly basis throughout the year to discuss
the outcome of previous food sampling and also to determine the appropriate follow up actions, as well
as planning future surveys. By liaising with other Local Authorities to produce an organised programme
of sampling, resources are efficiently targeted within the city councils food safety section and throughout
the Trent region. Also the information obtained from such surveys is of more significance since it allows
generalisations and continued evaluation of the microbiological quality of food from one year to the
next. In addition the results of a sampling programme are useful because they often highlight the risk
to public health by identifying the foods which are a potential food poisoning hazard.
Analysis/Examination
of Food Samples
All food samples obtained by Local Authorities
from the Nottinghamshire Food Group are analysed by the Department of Microbiology and Health Protection
Agency Collaborating Laboratory at Lincoln County Hospital. The criterion applied by the laboratory
to assess the microbiological quality of those foods sampled is the Guidelines for the microbiological
quality of some ready-to-eat foods sampled at point of sale, (Communicable Disease & Public Health,
2000). These guidelines are not legal requirements but they do provide standardisation for microbiologists/Environmental
Health Officers when interpreting the results obtained from microbiological examination of foods. However,
a suitably qualified Food Examiner as defined in the Food Safety (Sampling and Qualifications) Regulations
1990; can provide evidence as an expert witnesses during food safety proceedings when formal food samples
have been submitted.
The PHLS/HPA has provided environmental
health departments of Local
Authorities with microbiological advice and scientific expertise on the examination of food samples
for over fifty years. The guidelines were compiled by a collaboration of expert microbiologists working
within various sectors of the public health laboratories and communicable disease centres. The guidelines
reflect the collective experience of public health professionals and represent the extensive data bank
of results from national and local surveys from over 190,000 samples examined per year.
More
recently though the microbiological criteria applied to EC co-ordinated sampling surveys is based on
the published recommendations by the European Commission 2004/24/EC concerning a co-ordinated programme
for the official control of foodstuffs. Although the microbiological limits (numbers of bacteria detected
in the food) which are applied to determine food safety and quality may vary from that of the PHLS guidelines
for some bacteria/micro-organisms, the interpretation of the four grades of microbiological quality
are common to both sets of criteria. Foods are examined for foodborne pathogens such as Salmonella and
Campylobacter species, Escherichia coli 0157, and Listeria monocytogenes etc, to determine the safety
of the food. Tests are also performed to determine the presence of indicator organisms as these often
provide a reflection of hygiene standards and any post processing contamination of foods which, can
occur during handling and storage of ready-to-eat foods.
When
food samples
are examined the results are interpreted as one of the four grades of microbiological quality and these
are detailed below:
- ‘Satisfactory’ is the term applied
to foods which
is of good microbiological quality and therefore the numbers of bacteria found were relatively low or
not detected in the food.
- ‘Acceptable’
is the term applied to foods
that reflect a borderline limit of microbiological quality and therefore the numbers of bacteria detected
were higher than expected. A review of food handling procedures is necessary to ensure that safe food
is produced.
- ‘Unsatisfactory’ is
the term applied to foods with relatively
high numbers of bacteria and indicates a problem with food hygiene and handling procedures. A review
of working procedures must be conducted and Environmental Health Officers may take additional food samples
together with further inspection of the premises to determine the possible cause of the contamination.
- ‘Unaccepatble
/ potentially hazardous’ test results indicate that immediate action is required to locate the source
of the problem and consumption of such foods may cause illness. Such results may also form the basis
for prosecution by Local Authority Enforcement Officers (EHO), especially if the results occur in more
than one sample.
Results
of the Food Sampling Programme April
2003-March 2004 Conducted by Nottingham City Council
|
|
Satisfactory
|
Acceptable
|
Unsatisfactory
|
Total number of samples
|
April Raw Shell Eggs
|
14
|
0
|
4
|
18
|
May & June Raw Meat
|
11
|
0
|
0
|
11
|
July Ice used to cool drinks
|
6
|
0
|
4
|
10
|
August Dairy/non-dairy Ice-Cream
|
5
|
2
|
3
|
10
|
|
September & October Cooked Meats
|
6
|
0
|
5
|
15
|
|
November Salad/Garnishes
|
5
|
0
|
0
|
5
|
|
December & January Imported dried cured meat/meat products
|
19
|
0
|
0
|
19
|
|
February Water from pub drinks dispensers
|
4
|
0
|
6
|
10
|
|
March Soft Cheeses
|
10
|
0
|
0
|
10
|
|
Total expressed as percentage (4% of samples no result due to technical error)
|
74%
|
2%
|
20%
|
108
|
Graph
to Show the Results from Food Sampling Programme
April 2003-March 2004

The
results in the table and graph for the food sampling survey 2003/04 above show that 74% of food samples
examined were of good microbiological quality. The microbiological quality of several foods was found
to be acceptable/unsatisfactory due to the presence of higher than expected numbers of indicator organisms.
The foods would not have caused food poisoning since pathogens were not detected in any of the samples
that were ready to eat but improvements in the standard of hygiene practices and procedures were necessary.
In
the case of acceptable or unsatisfactory results it is standard procedure for a re-visit to the premises
to be made by the Sampling Officer/EHO to identify the possible sources of contamination. During the
revisit appropriate advice is given to the proprietor of the business in order to improve the microbiological
safety and quality of food produced at the premises. If necessary a resample of food will be taken to
ensure that business owners have implemented the relevant actions required to reduce/eliminate any contamination
that was originally identified from the previous unsatisfactory food sample result.
Back
to top